Name: Nguyễn Thị Thái
Class: QH10E20
ENTRY
4
ARGUMENT
STRUCTURES AND FALLACIES
ITEM
1:
“ A well known Hollywood actor, who often plays the role of
wise, authoritative characters, assuring you in a TV commercial that your money
will always be safe if you join a particular bank. He acts out a short scene in
which an attractive sales assistant begins to flirt with him only after he has
pulled out his fancy yellow credit card to pay for something. Presumably it was
his choice of bank – which you can emulate! – rather than his charisma, world
fame, and vast wealth which impressed him.”
-
Appeal to
Authority
Structure of the argument
(Premise) He
assures that your money will always be safe if you join a particular bank
(Premise 2) He is a
well known Hollywood actor
(Conclusion) you should have your money in a particular
bank
ITEM
2
“Joan
is scratched by a cat while visiting her friend. Two days later she comes down
with a fever. Joan concludes that the cat's scratch must be the cause of her
illness”.
-
Post Hoc
Structure of the argument
(Premise) Joan is
scratched by a cat.
(Premise 2) After
that, she comes down with a fever.
(Conclusion) The cat's scratch is the cause of her illness.
Argument error
Joan’s argument is weak because there are many reasons for her illness
ITEM
3
·
All children should have ample attention from
their parents.
- Parents
who work full-time cannot give ample attention to their children.
- Therefore, mothers
should not work full-time.
-
Irrelevant Conclusion
-
Argument error
Here the premises might support some conclusion
about working parents generally, but do not secure the truth of a conclusion
focused on women alone and not on men.
Source: http://www.philosophypages.com/lg/e06a.htm
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét